Thank you for visiting my literary site. Make yourself comfortable and enjoy the ride. I blog about books. If you believe in the power of books to transform lives, you are in the right place. Join me in my reading adventures. To avoid confusion let me clarify that I do NOT have Instagram or Facebook. This is my only site. I publish between two and four posts per month.
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Creating characters for a story
"The creation of something new is not accomplished by the intellect but by the play instinct acting from inner necessity. The creative mind plays with the objects it loves." Carl Jung
There is something enigmatic about the art of crafting a character. Once the characters become vivid to us, they acquire a life of their own. We no longer control their experiences.
Last year I wrote a blog entry that said that characters don't need to be likable, but they do need to feel real. However, I also have to admit that it is easier to seduce your readers when they root for one of your characters. In other words, when readers identify with one of your characters in some way, they feel more motivated to read the story because they imagine themselves in the character’s situation. They are eager to know what would happen to them if they did what the character is doing.
There is something enigmatic about the art of crafting a character. Once the characters become vivid to us, they acquire a life of their own. We no longer control their experiences.
Last year I wrote a blog entry that said that characters don't need to be likable, but they do need to feel real. However, I also have to admit that it is easier to seduce your readers when they root for one of your characters. In other words, when readers identify with one of your characters in some way, they feel more motivated to read the story because they imagine themselves in the character’s situation. They are eager to know what would happen to them if they did what the character is doing.
As a writer you dare
to explore emotional situations that make others feel embarrassed, scared or threatened.
Being a fiction writer involves the challenging task of being in somebody
else’s shoes because you need to see the world from your character’s
perspective.
This is an invitation to open your mind to possibilities you've never imagined before. You
experience a new life, forging your way through a labyrinth you are not
entirely familiar with. It means stepping out of your comfort zone. You need to be bold.
When you embark on this challenge, you are behaving like an actor or actress. You bring your characters to life by exposing your own shame, frustration, love, passion, insecurities, fears, anger or whatever emotions are needed.
This experience can be very profound and it
needs an open mind and heart. It requires compassion and
patience. Otherwise, the story will not sound real. It will sound judgmental and
shallow. Even if you don't agree with your character, you make every attempt to understand him/her.
A part of you needs to love the character, and while you write your story you become the character, but you are not the character.
A part of you needs to love the character, and while you write your story you become the character, but you are not the character.
So, as a reader, do you like to identify with at least one of the characters in a story?
As a writer, what is your relationship with your characters like?
As a writer, what is your relationship with your characters like?
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Pablo Picasso's Guernica
“Inspiration exists, but it has to find us working.” Pablo
Picasso
A couple of weeks
ago I attended an exhibition of Picasso’s work. It motivated me to read about his life and it helped me to understand how his art is connected to the social issues of his time and to the turmoil of
his personal experiences.
The reasons I found
this exhibition fascinating are the following:
-Picasso was daring. He was not afraid of innovating and he
pioneered an art movement called cubism (more on this on a future post).
-The variety of his work amazed me. His art evolved through
different phases that correlated with his life and his social setting.
-His long life-- he died at age 91 -- enabled him to create a massive amount of artwork. Interestingly, he lived in two different centuries.
Today I will focus on
his most famous masterpiece: Guernica .
When I was a child my
mother gave me a book of famous paintings by different artists. It included riveting explanations about each
of the masterpieces. One of them was Guernica .
The emotional impact it had on me must have been strong, for I never forgot this
painting.
Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) was born in Spain , but he migrated to France . While
he was living in Paris he was shocked by the news
of the bombing of Guernica , a small Basque town
in Northern Spain .
On April 26, 1937,
Nazi airplanes, backed by the extremist right wing forces of General Francisco Franco,
bombed Guernica
and 1,600 civilians were killed. The small town burned for three days. The
attack took place on a Monday because many people who lived on the farms went
to the market on that day of the week. Those who tried to escape were shot from
airplane machine guns or were blown up with explosives.
Pablo Picasso’s rage
at this atrocity inspired him to paint "Guernica" , which is described as "the most important work of art of the twentieth century". When he painted it, Picasso intended to expose the suffering and desperation that are inevitably attached to any war.
If we go from left
to right, the first figure we see is that of a woman. You can almost hear her shrieking.
She is holding her dead baby. Her eyes express profound anguish. Her naked
bosom suggests that she might have been nursing her baby when the bombings
struck the town.
The next thing you
see is a bull. The image of it is controversial. He is merely a witness of the woman’s grief. There are different
interpretations about the bull. Some people believe that the bull could be
somebody who, like Picasso, watches these calamities as an outsider: he is not
physically wounded, but he is emotionally touched. Picasso refused to attribute
a meaning to it, but bulls are a recurrent element in his artwork (the
“minotauro" has the head of a bull and the body of a man) and he associated it with lust and behaviors or emotions that are out of control.
There is a horse
lying in agony. It symbolizes the suffering of the people of Spain, a country
ravaged by war. There is chaos all around.
A dead soldier is lying
on the ground; his eyes express pain. His fight had no influence on the outcome
of the bombings of Guernica .
His arm is grasping a sword and a bunch of flowers. The flowers may represent his ideals, or they may be a symbol of hope. On the right side of the painting there is a woman on fire.
The painting is done
in black, white and different shades of gray, most likely to depict a gloomy
atmosphere. It may also be a symbol of the fact that the news of the war spread
through newspapers.
Had it not been for Picasso, the bombing of Guernica might have been forgotten by the world. Yet the theme of this painting is timeless and powerful.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
To the Arctic
"As mothers, the greatest gift we can pass on to our children is a healthy planet."
Would you like to swim underwater close to polar bears? Would you enjoy flying over the ocean? How about floating near huge masses of ice? If you've been to an IMAX theater you know what I am talking about.
"To the Arctic" is a captivating documentary about the Arctic. During the mid winter months the sun never rises in the Arctic and average temperatures are around -40 F; in the summer the sun never sets.
Polar bears are mysterious, intriguing creatures. The Arctic is their home and there is no other place on earth where they can live and thrive.
This white universe, the Arctic, is warming twice as fast as any other region of the planet. If the sea ice continues to melt at the current speed there will be no sea ice by the year 2,050.
Due to these changes, polar bears are struggling to survive and new challenges arise. It is getting hard for them to catch seals, and some male polar bears resort to cubs (baby polar bears) as a source of food.
Mother polar bears take two years to raise their cubs. During this time they nurture them and train them to become independent. These mothers are determined to protect their cubs from the hungry male polar bears, and they do so at the expense of their own lives. They are ready to sacrifice themselves to protect their offspring.
There is a scene in which a mother deters a male bear from catching her offspring. Her courage and tenacity win the battle.
Let's hope this motherly love will inspire mankind to save the Arctic...
Have a peaceful week.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
The art of writing fiction
"The true enemy of creativity is 'good sense'." Pablo Picasso
There is a tendency to lure writers into
thinking there is only one way of doing things when writing fiction. There is some advice out there that has been repeated many times. This advice should be regarded as an idea on
how to edit your story. Yet it is perceived as a set of rules or rigid principles.
I think there is an overuse of some of these imaginary "rules".
I think there is an overuse of some of these imaginary "rules".
Award-winning writer Julia Glass said that she
never followed the popular writing advice. I recently finished
reading her first novel, so I believe her. The only rule
in fiction is to captivate your reader. Bear in mind that your reader may be part of an audience, and remember that not every reader of a certain genre will enjoy the same story.
I will challenge some of these so-called
“rules” that I find on the blogosphere.
"Show, don’t tell": I know this has been
written hundreds of times. The reason why books on writing fiction mention this
suggestion is that there are higher chances of boring your readers
when you tell too much. Yet there are stories that tell and don't show and they are still riveting. On
the other hand, I've had the chance to read boring stories in which the writers make every attempt to show everything. These stories are devoid of original insights, thoughts and reflections. We have to keep guessing what is going on from
the characters' body movements and facial expressions. Some writers are obsessed with the “show,
don’t tell” idea. (Excuse me, I’d be better off watching a movie...). Mind you, personal tastes differ. The secret is to entertain the readers and opinions on how to do it differ. If you don't believe me, read both the good and bad reviews of a best-seller. You will be shocked.
Adverbs: I know that writers are not supposed to
overuse adverbs, but some new writers take this suggestion to the extreme. They
delete every single adverb they write. Adverbs
exist for a reason. Some of them are necessary and they need to stay. Use your
judgment. The same applies to adjectives.
Dialogue tags: I know
everybody is told to use “said” to be on the safe side. Occasionally, however,
you may be better off using another word. For example, you may need to mention
that the character snarled. There is a difference between saying something and
snarling it, right?
"Characters need to undergo some kind of
transformation": really? I disagree. Most characters may experience some kind of
transformation, but this does not happen in every story. Each character is a
unique complex human being. Why do they all have to be transformed? Perhaps the reader's views on a certain matter shift after reading a thought-provoking story in which the character is too stubborn.
"Your story needs action": there is a specific audience that is fond of action, but most readers prefer character development, tension and conflict. In fact, no single story will interest every reader.
As a reader, I am entitled to express my own opinions and I know some people will share
my views while others will disagree with me. This is good. Diversity makes life more
interesting.
Let me end this post with a quote by Ralph Waldo Emerson:
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path and leave a trail."
Let me end this post with a quote by Ralph Waldo Emerson:
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path and leave a trail."
Share your opinion.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Happiness
"In the midst of winter, I finally learned there was in me an invincible summer." Albert Camus
Last Saturday I attended an international film festival at the university in the city where I live.What you can see with a four-year old child is limited, but we managed to watch two documentaries. One of them was called "Happy".
Seeing this documentary confirmed my ideas on happiness. Let me share with you some of the most important points:
-Once the basic needs are covered studies found that more money will not make people happy.
-Those who associate happiness with money and material possessions are less happy than people who associate happiness with family, friends and things they like to do.
-Forty percent of our happiness depends on our genes. People under the same circumstances will have different levels of happiness.
-Studies showed that when people help each other, there is a release of chemicals in the blood that are associated with feeling happy (endorphines, dopamine, oxytocin). On the other hand, when people compete they feel stressed.
-People feel happy when they are "in their zone", which means that they are engrossed in doing something they love to do; during this time, they let go of worries and anxiety.
-Exercising and having fun make people happy. Again, this is associated with the release of brain chemicals I mentioned above.
Happiness is not a complicated emotion to me. Being with my daughter, my husband, helping others, doing things I love, looking at the sunset, staring at the naked branches of the trees in winter, being in touch with nature are some of the many things that make me happy.
This doesn't mean that I never feel sad, anxious or worried, but I think my happiness has to do with a sense of gratitude. It has to do with embracing the present without fretting over the future...
What makes you happy?
Saturday, March 2, 2013
Mozart's Sister and some reflections
"Hope is the thing with feathers
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without words,
And never stops at all."
Emily Dickinson
First some more good news! My short story "The Broken Wing of Your Ideal" was selected for the Freedom Forge Press Anthology, which will be released in July 2013.
Dear followers, thank you so much for your ongoing support! It means a lot to me.
A few days ago I watched the movie Mozart's Sister.After watching this movie I wondered about all the talent that has been squandered for so long. Scientists, artists, writers, musicians. Have you ever thought about this?
Even today, in many cultures, being a woman still means being a second-class citizen.
In Saudi Arabia, a rich nation, women need permission from their husbands- or a male relative if they don't have a spouse - to work, study or travel. They are not allowed to drive, and millions of them are not allowed to practice sports.
Last January people took to the streets to demand reforms, but they were intimidated, punished and harassed by the government. As I write this, more people are detained for protesting. You can read about this matter here:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/01/world/meast/saudi-arabia-protest/
Not too long ago, a woman was almost killed in Pakistan for supporting education for girls..
In many cultures, having a baby girl is considered a bad situation. Girls are less likely to have access to education. They are denied property rights and are forced to marry young. An interim report from the Global Campaign of Education states that girls cited parental preference for their male siblings. To read more on this, check this link:
http://www.campaignforeducation.org/en/campaigns/gender-discrimination
www.theirc.org
In certain countries and cultures, thousands of little girls are subjected to genital mutilation (clitoridectomy or infibulation), a procedure performed without anesthesia, and associated with several complications including infections, bleeding and chronic pain.
If you think that gender discrimination is a problem of the past where you live, think again. Are you not biased by the idea of gender? A study done at Yale showed that both men and women faculty were equally biased by gender when they assessed their students. Here is the link to the study.
"Female faculty members were just as likely as their male colleagues to favor the male student. The fact that faculty members’ bias was independent of their gender, scientific discipline, age, and tenure status suggests that it is likely unintentional, generated from widespread cultural stereotypes rather than a conscious intention to harm women."
Not surprisingly, there is a study that shows that there is disparity between men and women in the workplace. Women earn less money for working the same number of hours, and the more hours they work the less they make compared to their male counterparts.
So when does the problem start? Pre-school perhaps?
The first step to end gender discrimination is to acknowledge it. Both men and women are responsible for eradicating the biases from their minds.
It is a work in progress...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











