Thank you for visiting my literary site.
Make yourself comfortable and enjoy the ride. I blog about books.
If you believe in the power of books to transform lives, you are in the right place. Join me in my reading adventures. To avoid confusion let me clarify that I do NOT have Instagram or Facebook. This is my only site. I publish between two and four posts per month.
“To consider
adversity as a friend is the instruction of Chod.”
Machig
Labdron
True liberation happens when one is free from
the restraints of the ego. If you read Across many Mountains by Yangzom
Brauen--a book I wrote about last February--you are somewhat familiar with
Machig Labdron’s teachings. The Chod is a spiritual Tibetan practice introduced by a woman a thousand years ago. Her name was Machig Labdron, an eleventh century Tibetan
yogini.
After reading Across Many Mountains I
was intrigued to learn more about this aspect of Tibetan culture and Buddhism,
so I searched reading material on the subject, and I found “Machig Labdron and
the Foundations of Chod” by Jerome Edou. Jerome Edou has been an interpreter
for various lamas, and is an author and translator of works on Tibet and
Tibetan Buddhism.
The book chronicles the life story of Machig
Labdron, revealing her teachings and wisdom. The writer of this blog post has
been a meditation practitioner for many years; the book meets the needs of this
practitioner, responding to doubts and concerns and clearing spots of confusion. It
helps to integrate various aspects of meditation, transcending the act of
meditation itself.
It is not clear to me whether this book will
be appreciated by somebody who has no experience in the practice of meditation.
Machig Labdron’s words suggest there is truth in my statement:
“My Chod instructions consist in the authentic
teaching of Mahamudra,
And the
Mahamudra cannot be explained by words.”
Buddhists agree that people tend to be
enslaved by what the ego dictates. TheChod guides the practitioner to let go of the desires of the ego. This
liberation enables the mind to find its state of true freedom and clarity.
If you are just starting to explore this
subject, Loving-kindness by Sharon Salzberg may be a good beginning to
introduce this topic. Eventually, you may choose Jerome Edou’s book
on Machig Labdron and the Foundations of Chod.
It is time
for a break. By the end of April I will be back to My Writing Life blog
with more book recommendations, both fiction and non-fiction.
“The Animals’ Agenda brings us closer to the
day when our behavior toward our fellow species is determined not by
convenience or greed but by compassion.” Sy Montgomery
It is a common “mistake” to make
generalizations about groups of people, and this mistake is also made in
relation to animals. Just like people, animals have individual personalities.
Their intelligence and intuition allow them to adapt to their environment. They
have emotions and they experience trauma. Despite the scientific progress made
in understanding animal cognition and behaviors, the poor treatment of animals
continues to ignore the suffering and pain humans inflict upon them.
The
Animals' Agenda by Marc Bekoff and Jessica Pierce is a detailed account of our
interactions with animals; the authors propose solutions that can be applied to
address these issues.
Animal sentience is well established in the
scientific community, so why is it okay to disregard the ethical implications
of this knowledge?
What is the meaning of freedom? According to
Hope Ferdowsian, physician and bioethicist, freedom for animals has the same
meaning that it has for humans. “Freedom to meet our basic physical needs,
whatever those might be by species and individual—including freedom of movement
(bodily liberty); safe and secure from harm from humans (bodily integrity—and this
should include freedom from harm to the mind); freedom to love and bond with
whom we wish; respect for our choices, and freedom from humiliation and
intentional shaming.”
The Animals' Agenda reveals the ways in which we mistreat animals, and it opens the door
to a new possibility: the hope to turn the Anthropocene, or Age of Humanity, into
the “Compassionocene.” First, The Animals’ Agenda sets the path to acknowledge
how the consequences of our actions have effects on our own lives,
so we are not immune to these consequences.
There
is no way out of the chaos unless we choose a path of compassion and
understanding.
What we do to others, we do to ourselves.
Changes need to happen from the heart. Caring for others is intelligence in
action.
It was devastating and disturbing to learn about
the details of the massacre in a school in Texas. As a mother myself, my heart
breaks for the lives of the kids and the teachers lost. A hater shot 19
children and two teachers, but first he shot his grandmother. Then he had
enough time to crash his grandmother’s car and to perform these atrocities
inside the school building while enforcement officials hesitated outside and
stopped parents from breaking into the building to be with their children.
The hater had bought the ammunitions on his
eighteenth birthday. Every detail of this horrifying event is traumatizing.
There are no words to describe the desperation I feel as I type this paragraph.
The hater
responsible for killing 21 people had a history of abusing animals. Not only
did he abuse animals but he also promoted the abuse of animals by sharing
photos on social media.
Animal abuse should never be ignored.
The
white supremacist in Buffalo, New York, who killed ten people at the grocery
store two weeks ago, has a history of animal abuse, and it had never been
reported. Why?
How is
it possible that the person who whines about “politicization” of the shootings receives
large amounts of money from pro-gun groups for his political campaigns? His
statement is not only contradictory, but the whole situation seems to have been taken
from a terrifying dystopian novel. And why is animal abuse not taken seriously?
I wrote about the association between cruelty toward animals and criminal behavior when I reviewed the book Second Natureby Jonathan
Balcombe. You can also learn about this by reading the link of the Humane Society I provide at the bottom of this post.
The way we treat animals is indeed a
reflection of how we fail on many levels.
I am sharing an articles that may be of interest to you:
“Each
and every wolf has a story to share. Can we be trusted to listen?”
Marc Bekoff
Every member of a pack of wolves is valued by
the others and recognized as a unique individual who makes a special
contribution to the group. Their bonds are deep. Jim and Jamie Dutcher spent six years living in a
tent beside a pack of wolves by the Sawtooth Mountains of Idaho. The Wisdom of Wolves shares their knowledge and experience of living side by side with the Sawtooth pack of wolves,
taking us into an emotional journey of countless surprises.
Jim and Jamie Dutcher describe the wolves’
compassionate nature; they admire their curious courageous spirit. Wolves care well
for the most vulnerable in the pack, and they do what it takes to keep
everybody safe.Jim and Jamie examined
their relationships and paid special attention to the ways wolves communicate.
They also learned how wolves keep each other in check to maintain harmony in
the group.
The authors give each wolf a name and
describe their fascinating personalities. Besides, they explain how wolves
interact with other species.
When a
person kills an old wolf, the survival of the group as a whole is threatened
because old wolves have invaluable knowledge and experience that help the pack.
Furthermore, the loss of any member of the group causes deep pain among the
wolves. The Wisdom of Wolves elucidates how they grieve.
The
book was published by National Geographic. Both Jim and Jamie Dutcher raise public
awareness about the true nature of wolves by writing books, making
documentaries and giving talks in educational settings.
The
authors debunk the myth of the so-called lone wolf: “We often hear the term of the ‘lone wolf’ in reference to a person who
acts alone, cares for no one, and craves no companionship. Sadly, like so many
negative things falsely connected to wolves, the term has now come to mean a
loner who wishes to do us harm. Such a state is an aberration among humans, and
it’s equally rare among wolves.”
It is
important to clarify the concept to avoid misunderstandings and confusion. The
truth is that a lone wolf in nature is a temporary phenomenon. Biologists call
him a disperser. In reality “the lone
wolf in nature is a wolf in its third year or so who has decided to leave its
birth pack and strike out in search of new territory and a mate. What does a
lone wolf want? It wants to stop being a lone wolf. It wants togetherness, to
be part of something bigger.” It is not the aberration that the misused
term alludes to.
The term “lone wolf” should not be used to
describe people that have no compassion and empathy for others because it
perpetuates an attitude of ignorance toward wolves. It tarnishes the reputation
of wolves and is dangerous. Another relevant fact to highlight here is that
when the ecosystems where wolves thrive are respected, wolves don’t attack
cattle.
During
the fourth year of their project, Jim and Jamie encountered all kinds of
threats. They received anonymous letters in their mailbox asking them “to get
rid of those wolves or we will." Authorities put pressure on them to make sure
they would move out of their wolf camp. They were persecuted in different ways.
“Somebody
posted signs near our camp warning us to be gone or ‘wind up in the Custer
County jail.’ Even a former governor weighted in, saying our project was
nothing more than ‘wolf propaganda’ and should not be allowed to exist. Jamie
and I were painfully aware that we were responsible for the lives of these
wolves, but our ability to keep them safe seemed increasingly beyond our
control.”
In view of the stress they faced, Jim went
out for a walk to sort things out. During his walk, the leader of the pack,
Kamots, stayed close to him. He would disappear into the trees, and then he
would emerge again, trotting and exploring the territory, until something
amazing happened.
As Jim sat and talked to himself, wondering
what to do, Kamots approached him.
“In a
gesture I’d never seen before, he raised his paw up to me. I put out my hand
and pressed it against his paw, and we sat there like that for a minute in
silence. I felt as though he was assuring me that if we held up our end, he
would hold up his. We should continue to deal with the human world, and in his
calm, strong, confident way, he would keep his pack stable and safe. He was
that kind of leader.”
The wolves gave Jim and Jamie a very special
gift: the gift of trust between species, and through this gift they learned a
lot about life, love, and compassion. You can visit their website to learn
more about their work:
If you enjoyed this post, you will probably welcome my writing on these books:
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley is a satire about a society
in which people are labeled and classified into groups or castes. They are
conditioned to behave a certain way since they are born. Anybody who dares to
think original thoughts or to crave solitude is considered dangerous and
weird. These people are treated like misfits and are deported to a distant
island.
In Brave New
World everybody is supposed to be happy, but this happiness is not true
happiness. It is loveless and synthetic. It is based on the consumption of
goods. Human beings are deprived of love and compassion, and those who dare to do something differently are treated with contempt and sent away.
People are encouraged to consume a drug called “Soma” to feel good and “happy” all the time. In this male dominated society sexual
promiscuity is the norm. Yet the sexual act is meaningless. Aldous Huxley’s
Brave New Word is the description of a conformist society in which art and
science are considered threats to their stability and their so-called “freedom”. They have to be muzzled to satisfy the interests of the status quo. Literature, for example, is of no interest to people because they fear that it
will make them feel sad, so they shy away from it just as they reject anything
that is thought-provoking. Literature carries the risk of awakening the
possibility of dealing with original thoughts.
Even though
the individuals in Brave New World believe they are free they are all expected
to behave in predictable ways. Anything
that is considered unconventional or that strays from standard patterns of behavior is treated with distrust, and so the root
of the irony is that this world is neither brave nor new.
Interestingly,
George Orwell expressed his concerns about banned books in his popular novel
1984. Aldous Huxley, on the other hand,
portrayed a society in which there was no need to censor books anymore because people
did not care about literature altogether: since a very early age they were
conditioned to believe that literature was boring, depressing or a threat to their
stability.
Soon after
the publication of 1984, Huxley wrote a letter to George Orwell. I will share a
fragment of this letter:
“My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will
find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for
power, and those ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World.
“The lust for power can be just as completely
satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude or by flogging and
kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of “Nineteen
Eighty-Four” is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more
resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World. The change will be brought about as a result
of a felt need for increased efficiency.”